State of Web Access2026

For a sector that makes the hardware and software powering the web, the defences are surprisingly light. WAF runs below the global average at 86%, and just 9% of sites name an AI crawler in a Disallow rule — one of the quieter AI-policy stances in the survey.

State of Web Access 2026
Computers & Electronics · Barrier Profile · 2026

JavaScript leads Computers & Electronics's secondary barrier stack above the norm

JavaScript leads Computers & Electronics's secondary barrier stack above the norm
Value
WAF86%
Antibot13%
CAPTCHA17%
JavaScript34%
Rate Limiting18%
TLS15%

WAF at 86% is the dominant barrier. JavaScript (34%) leads secondary coverage. The remaining barriers sit materially lower, giving Computers & Electronics a narrow but defined secondary layer.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Computers & Electronics · Access Barrier Adoption · 2026

WAF leads Computers & Electronics at 86% — JavaScript is the main secondary layer

WAF leads Computers & Electronics at 86% — JavaScript is the main secondary layer
Value
WAF86%
Antibot13%
CAPTCHA17%
JavaScript34%
Rate Limiting18%
TLS15%
Has robots.txt73%
Blocks AI crawlers9%

WAF dominates at 86%. JavaScript (34%) leads active secondary barriers, followed by Rate Limiting (18%). The remaining three barriers all sit at or below 17% — a concentrated rather than broadly stacked profile.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Computers & Electronics · Barrier Count Distribution · 2026

Computers & Electronics's barrier counts are spread — no single configuration dominates

Computers & Electronics's barrier counts are spread — no single configuration dominates
% of sites
0 barriers9%
1 barrier39%
2 barriers28%
3 barriers13%
4 barriers6%
5 barriers5%
6 barriers0%

Barrier counts vary widely across Computers & Electronics sites. Single-barrier configurations are the modal count at 39%, but the distribution is broad. 24% of sites carry three or more.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Computers & Electronics · Recommended Scraping Tier · 2026

Simple is the dominant access tier across Computers & Electronics — with a significant Easy share

Simple is the dominant access tier across Computers & Electronics — with a significant Easy share
Mean recommended tier
All sites1.74

A mean recommended tier of 1.74 and a median of Easy place Computers & Electronics around the middle of the sectors surveyed. 47% of sites are Simple to access; 13% require Moderate or above.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Computers & Electronics · Tier Distribution · 2026

Simple is the dominant tier in Computers & Electronics, but Easy accounts for a significant share

Simple is the dominant tier in Computers & Electronics, but Easy accounts for a significant share
% of sites
1 - Simple47%
2 - Easy40%
3 - Moderate8%
4 - Complex2%
5 - Advanced3%

Simple (47%) is the most common tier. Simple and Easy together account for 87% of sites, while 8% land at Moderate and 5% at Complex or Advanced.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Computers & Electronics · robots.txt Coverage · 2026

Around three-quarters of Computers & Electronics sites publish a robots.txt

Around three-quarters of Computers & Electronics sites publish a robots.txt
% of sites
Publish a valid robots.txt73%

73% of Computers & Electronics sites have a valid robots.txt. The remaining 27% leave crawl policy entirely undefined — a meaningful gap for a sector of this scale.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Computers & Electronics · Named Agents in robots.txt · 2026

Computers & Electronics's robots.txt files show moderate engagement with named bot policy

Computers & Electronics's robots.txt files show moderate engagement with named bot policy
% of sites
036%
133%
2–412%
5–910%
10–153%
16+6%

A mean of 11.6 named agents reflects moderate bot-policy investment in Computers & Electronics. 36% of sites name no agents; 6% name 16 or more. The median of 1 suggests a bimodal split.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Computers & Electronics · Bot Category Mentions in robots.txt · 2026

SEO audit tools and AI crawlers draw near-equal attention in Computers & Electronics robots.txt

SEO audit tools and AI crawlers draw near-equal attention in Computers & Electronics robots.txt
% of sites
AI crawlers11%
SEO / search indexing10%
SEO audit tools13%
Commercial scrapers2%
Social / content scrapers1%
Archive / research crawlers4%
Monitoring / uptime bots1%

SEO audit tools appears in 13% of Computers & Electronics sites; AI crawlers in 11%. The near-equal split reflects a sector that treats both categories with comparable priority. Figures are percentages of all 100 sites.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Computers & Electronics · robots.txt Rule Posture Types · 2026

Uniform per-agent rules dominate Computers & Electronics robots.txt files

Uniform per-agent rules dominate Computers & Electronics robots.txt files
% of sites
Uniform per-agent rules47%
Path-level mixed rules23%
Allow-only (no Disallow rules)3%
Mixed AI posture1%
Blanket Disallow: /0%

Uniform per-agent rules lead at 47%, with path-level mixed rules at 23%. Mixed AI posture (1%) and blanket Disallow (0%) are minimal.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Computers & Electronics · Bot Agent Disallow vs Allow · 2026

AhrefsBot leads named Disallow rules in Computers & Electronics robots.txt

AhrefsBot leads named Disallow rules in Computers & Electronics robots.txt
DisallowedAllowed (whitelisted)
*57%26%
GPTBot6%3%
AhrefsBot8%
Nutch7%
MJ12bot7%
CCBot5%1%
Amazonbot4%1%
ClaudeBot3%2%
Google-Extended3%2%
Bytespider4%
meta-externalagent3%1%
SeznamBot3%1%
Teleport4%
TeleportPro4%
WebBandit4%
WebCopier4%
WebStripper4%
naver4%
Gigabot4%
Googlebot3%1%
Googlebot-Image2%2%
AdsBot-Google2%2%
Applebot-Extended3%
Alexibot3%
Barkrowler3%

Values are percentages of all 100 Computers & Electronics sites surveyed. The wildcard (*) leads at 57% Disallow. Among named agents, AhrefsBot, Nutch, MJ12bot are the most frequently targeted — focused on non-AI crawlers.

100 sites surveyed · 73 with robots.txt
State of Web Access 2026
Retail & E-commerce · Access Barriers · 2026

Computers & Electronics sits mid-table within the Retail & E-commerce cohort

Computers & Electronics sits mid-table within the Retail & E-commerce cohort
WAFAntibotCAPTCHAJavaScriptRate LimitTLSrobots.txtBlocks AITier
Apparel & Fashion91%21%15%49%54%32%69%4%Tier 3
Beauty & Cosmetics91%30%36%40%31%30%76%13%Tier 2
Computer & Video Games94%27%26%44%22%13%81%23%Tier 1
Computer Hardware93%30%20%42%33%15%73%13%Tier 2
Computers & Electronics86%13%17%34%18%15%73%9%Tier 2
Consumer Electronics92%27%27%46%29%20%83%9%Tier 2
Equipment & Supplies96%27%31%41%26%14%68%8%Tier 2
Food & Beverages92%24%26%51%31%11%68%23%Tier 2
Furniture97%33%28%49%40%21%67%5%Tier 2
Jewelry & Luxury83%28%23%41%42%34%80%9%Tier 2
Packaging & Containers95%18%35%42%17%11%80%6%Tier 1
Retail96%19%15%51%33%20%85%29%Tier 2
Sporting Goods89%26%24%41%49%32%78%7%Tier 2
Sports98%11%15%61%23%11%89%33%Tier 1
Textiles & Nonwovens92%6%38%35%17%14%78%7%Tier 1
Tobacco98%30%52%38%30%15%76%3%Tier 1
Wholesalers & Liquidators94%24%22%44%30%13%80%7%Tier 2
Wine & Spirits95%24%28%47%32%15%84%14%Tier 1

Across Retail & E-commerce, Computers & Electronics's barrier rates are broadly in line with peers. WAF at 86%, JavaScript at 34%, and AI blocking at 9% all sit near the cohort median. Tier difficulty (mean 1.61) is below the group average.

11,100 landing pages