Overview

JavaScript and Rate Limiting both elevate Consumer Electronics's active barrier profile
| Value | |
|---|---|
| WAF | 92% |
| Antibot | 27% |
| CAPTCHA | 27% |
| JavaScript | 46% |
| Rate Limiting | 29% |
| TLS | 20% |
WAF leads at 92%. JavaScript (46%) and Rate Limiting (29%) together form a multi-layer active stack — more than most sectors deploy alongside WAF.
Barrier Landscape

JavaScript is Consumer Electronics's dominant secondary barrier by a wide margin
| Value | |
|---|---|
| WAF | 92% |
| Antibot | 27% |
| CAPTCHA | 27% |
| JavaScript | 46% |
| Rate Limiting | 29% |
| TLS | 20% |
| Has robots.txt | 83% |
| Blocks AI crawlers | 9% |
WAF at 92% and JavaScript at 46% together form the sector's main defensive layer. Rate Limiting (29%) follows at a distance. The barrier profile is concentrated rather than broadly spread.

Two-barrier stacks are Consumer Electronics's most common security posture
| % of sites | |
|---|---|
| 0 barriers | 4% |
| 1 barrier | 24% |
| 2 barriers | 34% |
| 3 barriers | 17% |
| 4 barriers | 7% |
| 5 barriers | 14% |
| 6 barriers | 0% |
34% of Consumer Electronics sites carry exactly 2 barriers. 38% stack three or more. 4% carry none — a low share of unprotected sites for this sector.

Consumer Electronics is moderately challenging to access — harder than most sectors
| Mean recommended tier | |
|---|---|
| All sites | 2.12 |
A mean recommended tier of 2.12 and a median of Easy place Consumer Electronics toward the harder end of the sectors surveyed. 23% of sites are Simple to access; 30% require Moderate or above.

Easy is the most common access tier across Consumer Electronics sites
| % of sites | |
|---|---|
| 1 - Simple | 23.2% |
| 2 - Easy | 46.5% |
| 3 - Moderate | 26.3% |
| 4 - Complex | 3% |
| 5 - Advanced | 1% |
Easy (46%) is the most common tier. Simple and Easy together account for 70% of sites, while 26% land at Moderate and 4% at Complex or Advanced.
robots.txt

Most Consumer Electronics sites publish a robots.txt — coverage above the norm
| % of sites | |
|---|---|
| Publish a valid robots.txt | 83% |
83% of Consumer Electronics sites publish a valid robots.txt. The 17% without a file leave crawl policy undefined — a lower gap than the cross-sector average of around 24%.

Consumer Electronics's robots.txt files show moderate engagement with named bot policy
| % of sites | |
|---|---|
| 0 | 23% |
| 1 | 29% |
| 2–4 | 18% |
| 5–9 | 15% |
| 10–15 | 3% |
| 16+ | 12% |
A mean of 11.8 named agents reflects moderate bot-policy investment in Consumer Electronics. 23% of sites name no agents; 12% name 16 or more. The median of 1 suggests a bimodal split.

SEO audit tools lead Consumer Electronics's robots.txt mentions ahead of AI crawlers
| % of sites | |
|---|---|
| AI crawlers | 12% |
| SEO / search indexing | 16% |
| SEO audit tools | 22% |
| Commercial scrapers | 3% |
| Social / content scrapers | 2% |
| Archive / research crawlers | 8% |
| Monitoring / uptime bots | 0% |
SEO audit tools are mentioned by 22% of Consumer Electronics sites — the leading bot category, ahead of AI crawlers at 12%. Figures are percentages of all 100 sites surveyed.

Uniform per-agent rules dominate Consumer Electronics robots.txt files
| % of sites | |
|---|---|
| Uniform per-agent rules | 43% |
| Path-level mixed rules | 39% |
| Allow-only (no Disallow rules) | 0% |
| Mixed AI posture | 2% |
| Blanket Disallow: / | 1% |
Across all Consumer Electronics sites, uniform per-agent rules lead at 43%, with path-level mixed rules at 39%. Mixed AI posture (2%) and blanket Disallow (1%) are minimal.

Baiduspider leads named Disallow rules in Consumer Electronics robots.txt
| Disallowed | Allowed (whitelisted) | |
|---|---|---|
| * | 76% | 34% |
| AdsBot-Google | 7% | 7% |
| AdsBot-Google-Mobile | 6% | 7% |
| Baiduspider | 11% | 1% |
| GPTBot | 8% | 3% |
| AhrefsBot | 10% | 1% |
| Google-Extended | 6% | 3% |
| MSIECrawler | 9% | — |
| Nutch | 9% | — |
| Googlebot | 6% | 2% |
| Yandex | 6% | 2% |
| AhrefsSiteAudit | 7% | 1% |
| CCBot | 6% | 1% |
| ClaudeBot | 4% | 3% |
| adsbot-google | 7% | — |
| Amazonbot | 5% | 1% |
| WebCopier | 6% | — |
| MJ12bot | 6% | — |
| Bytespider | 4% | 1% |
| ChatGPT-User | 3% | 2% |
| GoogleOther | 2% | 3% |
| HTTrack | 5% | — |
| SiteSnagger | 5% | — |
| WebStripper | 5% | — |
| larbin | 5% | — |
Values are percentages of all 100 Consumer Electronics sites surveyed. The wildcard (*) leads at 76% Disallow. Among named agents, Baiduspider, AhrefsBot, MSIECrawler are the most frequently targeted — focused on non-AI crawlers.
Industry Cohort

Consumer Electronics sits mid-table within the Retail & E-commerce cohort
| WAF | Antibot | CAPTCHA | JavaScript | Rate Limit | TLS | robots.txt | Blocks AI | Tier | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apparel & Fashion | 91% | 21% | 15% | 49% | 54% | 32% | 69% | 4% | Tier 3 |
| Beauty & Cosmetics | 91% | 30% | 36% | 40% | 31% | 30% | 76% | 13% | Tier 2 |
| Computer & Video Games | 94% | 27% | 26% | 44% | 22% | 13% | 81% | 23% | Tier 1 |
| Computer Hardware | 93% | 30% | 20% | 42% | 33% | 15% | 73% | 13% | Tier 2 |
| Computers & Electronics | 86% | 13% | 17% | 34% | 18% | 15% | 73% | 9% | Tier 2 |
| Consumer Electronics | 92% | 27% | 27% | 46% | 29% | 20% | 83% | 9% | Tier 2 |
| Equipment & Supplies | 96% | 27% | 31% | 41% | 26% | 14% | 68% | 8% | Tier 2 |
| Food & Beverages | 92% | 24% | 26% | 51% | 31% | 11% | 68% | 23% | Tier 2 |
| Furniture | 97% | 33% | 28% | 49% | 40% | 21% | 67% | 5% | Tier 2 |
| Jewelry & Luxury | 83% | 28% | 23% | 41% | 42% | 34% | 80% | 9% | Tier 2 |
| Packaging & Containers | 95% | 18% | 35% | 42% | 17% | 11% | 80% | 6% | Tier 1 |
| Retail | 96% | 19% | 15% | 51% | 33% | 20% | 85% | 29% | Tier 2 |
| Sporting Goods | 89% | 26% | 24% | 41% | 49% | 32% | 78% | 7% | Tier 2 |
| Sports | 98% | 11% | 15% | 61% | 23% | 11% | 89% | 33% | Tier 1 |
| Textiles & Nonwovens | 92% | 6% | 38% | 35% | 17% | 14% | 78% | 7% | Tier 1 |
| Tobacco | 98% | 30% | 52% | 38% | 30% | 15% | 76% | 3% | Tier 1 |
| Wholesalers & Liquidators | 94% | 24% | 22% | 44% | 30% | 13% | 80% | 7% | Tier 2 |
| Wine & Spirits | 95% | 24% | 28% | 47% | 32% | 15% | 84% | 14% | Tier 1 |
Across Retail & E-commerce, Consumer Electronics's barrier rates are broadly in line with peers. WAF at 92%, JavaScript at 46%, and AI blocking at 9% all sit near the cohort median. Tier difficulty (mean 2.07) is above the group average.