State of Web Access2026

Plastics & Polymers sites reach near-universal WAF coverage at 98%, yet antibot sits at just 10% — well below the global average. CAPTCHA (29%) does most of the secondary work, suggesting a sector that deploys passive checkpoints rather than active bot-detection.

State of Web Access 2026
Plastics & Polymers · Barrier Profile · 2026

JavaScript leads Plastics & Polymers's secondary barrier stack above the norm

JavaScript leads Plastics & Polymers's secondary barrier stack above the norm
Value
WAF98%
Antibot10%
CAPTCHA29%
JavaScript34%
Rate Limiting13%
TLS10%

WAF at 98% is the dominant barrier. JavaScript (34%) leads secondary coverage. The remaining barriers sit materially lower, giving Plastics & Polymers a narrow but defined secondary layer.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Plastics & Polymers · Access Barrier Adoption · 2026

WAF leads Plastics & Polymers at 98% — JavaScript is the main secondary layer

WAF leads Plastics & Polymers at 98% — JavaScript is the main secondary layer
Value
WAF98%
Antibot10%
CAPTCHA29%
JavaScript34%
Rate Limiting13%
TLS10%
Has robots.txt80%
Blocks AI crawlers4%

WAF dominates at 98%. JavaScript (34%) leads active secondary barriers, followed by CAPTCHA (29%). The remaining three barriers all sit at or below 13% — a concentrated rather than broadly stacked profile.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Plastics & Polymers · Barrier Count Distribution · 2026

Single-barrier configurations dominate Plastics & Polymers — mostly WAF alone

Single-barrier configurations dominate Plastics & Polymers — mostly WAF alone
% of sites
0 barriers2%
1 barrier42%
2 barriers33%
3 barriers13%
4 barriers3%
5 barriers7%
6 barriers0%

42% of Plastics & Polymers sites carry exactly one barrier — almost always WAF. Two-barrier stacks add 33%. Just 23% of sites layer three or more defences.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Plastics & Polymers · Recommended Scraping Tier · 2026

Plastics & Polymers sites are predominantly Simple to access

Plastics & Polymers sites are predominantly Simple to access
Mean recommended tier
All sites1.28

A mean recommended tier of 1.28 and a median of Simple place Plastics & Polymers among the most accessible sectors surveyed. 79% of sites are Simple to access; 5% require Moderate or above.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Plastics & Polymers · Tier Distribution · 2026

Simple tier covers more than three-quarters of Plastics & Polymers sites

Simple tier covers more than three-quarters of Plastics & Polymers sites
% of sites
1 - Simple79%
2 - Easy16%
3 - Moderate4%
4 - Complex0%
5 - Advanced1%

Simple (79%) is the most common tier. Simple and Easy together account for 95% of sites, while 4% land at Moderate and 1% at Complex or Advanced.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Plastics & Polymers · robots.txt Coverage · 2026

Nearly four in five of Plastics & Polymers sites publish a robots.txt

Nearly four in five of Plastics & Polymers sites publish a robots.txt
% of sites
Publish a valid robots.txt80%

80% of Plastics & Polymers sites have a valid robots.txt. The remaining 20% leave crawl policy entirely undefined — a meaningful gap for a sector of this scale.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Plastics & Polymers · Named Agents in robots.txt · 2026

Plastics & Polymers sites name a handful of agents in robots.txt — few commit to comprehensive policies

Plastics & Polymers sites name a handful of agents in robots.txt — few commit to comprehensive policies
% of sites
032%
146%
2–49%
5–98%
10–150%
16+5%

The mean of 2.5 named agents reflects limited bot-policy investment in Plastics & Polymers. 32% of sites name no agents; 46% name exactly one. Only 5% maintain a list of 16 or more named bots.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Plastics & Polymers · Bot Category Mentions in robots.txt · 2026

SEO audit tools and SEO / search indexing draw near-equal attention in Plastics & Polymers robots.txt

SEO audit tools and SEO / search indexing draw near-equal attention in Plastics & Polymers robots.txt
% of sites
AI crawlers6%
SEO / search indexing8%
SEO audit tools9%
Commercial scrapers0%
Social / content scrapers0%
Archive / research crawlers1%
Monitoring / uptime bots0%

SEO audit tools appears in 9% of Plastics & Polymers sites; SEO / search indexing in 8%. The near-equal split reflects a sector that treats both categories with comparable priority. Figures are percentages of all 100 sites.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Plastics & Polymers · robots.txt Rule Posture Types · 2026

Uniform per-agent rules dominate Plastics & Polymers robots.txt files

Uniform per-agent rules dominate Plastics & Polymers robots.txt files
% of sites
Uniform per-agent rules50%
Path-level mixed rules25%
Allow-only (no Disallow rules)5%
Mixed AI posture0%
Blanket Disallow: /0%

Uniform per-agent rules lead at 50%, with path-level mixed rules at 25%. Mixed AI posture (0%) and blanket Disallow (0%) are minimal.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Plastics & Polymers · Bot Agent Disallow vs Allow · 2026

AhrefsBot leads named Disallow rules in Plastics & Polymers robots.txt

AhrefsBot leads named Disallow rules in Plastics & Polymers robots.txt
DisallowedAllowed (whitelisted)
*62%29%
AhrefsBot8%
Screaming Frog SEO Spider4%2%
Baiduspider5%
DataForSeoBot5%
Yandex5%
turnitinbot5%
GPTBot3%2%
360Spider4%
360Spider-Image4%
360Spider-Video4%
BLEXBot4%
BacklinkCrawler4%
Baiduspider-image4%
Baiduspider-news4%
Baiduspider-video4%
MJ12bot4%
SEOkicks-Robot4%
SearchmetricsBot4%
SeekportBot4%
SemrushBot4%
Sogou4%
Sogou-Image4%
Sogou-Video4%
SputnikBot4%

Values are percentages of all 100 Plastics & Polymers sites surveyed. The wildcard (*) leads at 62% Disallow. Among named agents, AhrefsBot, Baiduspider, DataForSeoBot are the most frequently targeted — focused on non-AI crawlers.

100 sites surveyed · 80 with robots.txt
State of Web Access 2026
Manufacturing & Logistics · Access Barriers · 2026

Plastics & Polymers sits mid-table within the Manufacturing & Logistics cohort

Plastics & Polymers sits mid-table within the Manufacturing & Logistics cohort
WAFAntibotCAPTCHAJavaScriptRate LimitTLSrobots.txtBlocks AITier
Aerospace & Defense87%17%26%36%21%15%67%6%Tier 1
Chemicals83%8%19%31%7%8%71%8%Tier 1
Civil Engineering89%13%22%38%19%14%60%5%Tier 1
Import & Export93%19%17%35%17%13%69%6%Tier 1
Machinery91%13%17%49%20%15%80%10%Tier 2
Mail & Package Delivery91%15%19%37%17%15%70%3%Tier 1
Manufacturing92%20%19%45%24%18%75%9%Tier 2
Maritime87%22%24%41%19%12%62%8%Tier 1
Metals & Mining87%26%30%39%25%16%72%4%Tier 1
Plastics & Polymers98%10%29%34%13%10%80%4%Tier 1
Transportation & Logistics78%15%16%35%17%18%67%2%Tier 1
Warehousing98%18%27%38%22%8%75%4%Tier 1

Across Manufacturing & Logistics, Plastics & Polymers's barrier rates are broadly in line with peers. WAF at 98%, JavaScript at 34%, and AI blocking at 4% all sit near the cohort median. Tier difficulty (mean 1.26) is above the group average.

11,100 landing pages