State of Web Access2026

Textiles & Nonwovens reaches for CAPTCHA (38%) as its primary active defence — while antibot sits at just 6%, a fraction of the global average. The sector challenges bots rather than identifying them.

State of Web Access 2026
Textiles & Nonwovens · Barrier Profile · 2026

CAPTCHA and JavaScript both elevate Textiles & Nonwovens's active barrier profile

CAPTCHA and JavaScript both elevate Textiles & Nonwovens's active barrier profile
Value
WAF92%
Antibot6%
CAPTCHA38%
JavaScript35%
Rate Limiting17%
TLS14%

WAF leads at 92%. CAPTCHA (38%) and JavaScript (35%) together form a multi-layer active stack — more than most sectors deploy alongside WAF.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Textiles & Nonwovens · Access Barrier Adoption · 2026

WAF leads Textiles & Nonwovens at 92% — CAPTCHA is the main secondary layer

WAF leads Textiles & Nonwovens at 92% — CAPTCHA is the main secondary layer
Value
WAF92%
Antibot6%
CAPTCHA38%
JavaScript35%
Rate Limiting17%
TLS14%
Has robots.txt78%
Blocks AI crawlers7%

WAF dominates at 92%. CAPTCHA (38%) leads active secondary barriers, followed by JavaScript (35%). The remaining three barriers all sit at or below 17% — a concentrated rather than broadly stacked profile.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Textiles & Nonwovens · Barrier Count Distribution · 2026

Two-barrier stacks are Textiles & Nonwovens's most common security posture

Two-barrier stacks are Textiles & Nonwovens's most common security posture
% of sites
0 barriers5%
1 barrier28%
2 barriers40%
3 barriers18%
4 barriers5%
5 barriers4%
6 barriers0%

40% of Textiles & Nonwovens sites carry exactly 2 barriers. 27% stack three or more. 5% carry none — a low share of unprotected sites for this sector.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Textiles & Nonwovens · Recommended Scraping Tier · 2026

Simple is the dominant access tier across Textiles & Nonwovens

Simple is the dominant access tier across Textiles & Nonwovens
Mean recommended tier
All sites1.62

A mean recommended tier of 1.62 and a median of Simple place Textiles & Nonwovens around the middle of the sectors surveyed. 51% of sites are Simple to access; 10% require Moderate or above.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Textiles & Nonwovens · Tier Distribution · 2026

Simple is the dominant tier in Textiles & Nonwovens, but Easy accounts for a significant share

Simple is the dominant tier in Textiles & Nonwovens, but Easy accounts for a significant share
% of sites
1 - Simple51%
2 - Easy39%
3 - Moderate7%
4 - Complex3%
5 - Advanced0%

Simple (51%) is the most common tier. Simple and Easy together account for 90% of sites, while 7% land at Moderate and 3% at Complex or Advanced.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Textiles & Nonwovens · robots.txt Coverage · 2026

Nearly four in five of Textiles & Nonwovens sites publish a robots.txt

Nearly four in five of Textiles & Nonwovens sites publish a robots.txt
% of sites
Publish a valid robots.txt78%

78% of Textiles & Nonwovens sites have a valid robots.txt. The remaining 22% leave crawl policy entirely undefined — a meaningful gap for a sector of this scale.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Textiles & Nonwovens · Named Agents in robots.txt · 2026

Textiles & Nonwovens sites name a handful of agents in robots.txt — few commit to comprehensive policies

Textiles & Nonwovens sites name a handful of agents in robots.txt — few commit to comprehensive policies
% of sites
022%
137%
2–411%
5–921%
10–151%
16+8%

The mean of 5.7 named agents reflects limited bot-policy investment in Textiles & Nonwovens. 22% of sites name no agents; 37% name exactly one. Only 8% maintain a list of 16 or more named bots.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Textiles & Nonwovens · Bot Category Mentions in robots.txt · 2026

SEO audit tools lead Textiles & Nonwovens's robots.txt mentions ahead of AI crawlers

SEO audit tools lead Textiles & Nonwovens's robots.txt mentions ahead of AI crawlers
% of sites
AI crawlers13%
SEO / search indexing11%
SEO audit tools27%
Commercial scrapers4%
Social / content scrapers3%
Archive / research crawlers5%
Monitoring / uptime bots0%

SEO audit tools are mentioned by 27% of Textiles & Nonwovens sites — the leading bot category, ahead of AI crawlers at 13%. Figures are percentages of all 100 sites surveyed.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Textiles & Nonwovens · robots.txt Rule Posture Types · 2026

Uniform per-agent rules dominate Textiles & Nonwovens robots.txt files

Uniform per-agent rules dominate Textiles & Nonwovens robots.txt files
% of sites
Uniform per-agent rules48%
Path-level mixed rules27%
Allow-only (no Disallow rules)2%
Mixed AI posture2%
Blanket Disallow: /1%

Uniform per-agent rules lead at 48%, with path-level mixed rules at 27%. Mixed AI posture (2%) and blanket Disallow (1%) are minimal.

100 sites
State of Web Access 2026
Textiles & Nonwovens · Bot Agent Disallow vs Allow · 2026

AhrefsBot leads named Disallow rules in Textiles & Nonwovens robots.txt

AhrefsBot leads named Disallow rules in Textiles & Nonwovens robots.txt
DisallowedAllowed (whitelisted)
*75%29%
AhrefsBot24%2%
AhrefsSiteAudit16%2%
adsbot-google15%1%
Nutch14%
MJ12bot10%1%
AdsBot-Google3%7%
SemrushBot6%2%
Googlebot5%3%
AdsBot-Google-Mobile2%4%
DotBot4%1%
BLEXBot5%
Baiduspider5%
Googlebot-Image2%3%
Storebot-Google2%3%
PetalBot4%
rogerbot4%
Pinterest3%1%
Exabot3%1%
Googlebot-Video2%2%
Sogou3%1%
ia_archiver3%1%
AdIdxBot2%2%
Amazonbot3%
CCBot3%

Values are percentages of all 100 Textiles & Nonwovens sites surveyed. The wildcard (*) leads at 75% Disallow. Among named agents, AhrefsBot, AhrefsSiteAudit, adsbot-google are the most frequently targeted — focused on non-AI crawlers.

100 sites surveyed · 78 with robots.txt
State of Web Access 2026
Retail & E-commerce · Access Barriers · 2026

Textiles & Nonwovens sits mid-table within the Retail & E-commerce cohort

Textiles & Nonwovens sits mid-table within the Retail & E-commerce cohort
WAFAntibotCAPTCHAJavaScriptRate LimitTLSrobots.txtBlocks AITier
Apparel & Fashion91%21%15%49%54%32%69%4%Tier 3
Beauty & Cosmetics91%30%36%40%31%30%76%13%Tier 2
Computer & Video Games94%27%26%44%22%13%81%23%Tier 1
Computer Hardware93%30%20%42%33%15%73%13%Tier 2
Computers & Electronics86%13%17%34%18%15%73%9%Tier 2
Consumer Electronics92%27%27%46%29%20%83%9%Tier 2
Equipment & Supplies96%27%31%41%26%14%68%8%Tier 2
Food & Beverages92%24%26%51%31%11%68%23%Tier 2
Furniture97%33%28%49%40%21%67%5%Tier 2
Jewelry & Luxury83%28%23%41%42%34%80%9%Tier 2
Packaging & Containers95%18%35%42%17%11%80%6%Tier 1
Retail96%19%15%51%33%20%85%29%Tier 2
Sporting Goods89%26%24%41%49%32%78%7%Tier 2
Sports98%11%15%61%23%11%89%33%Tier 1
Textiles & Nonwovens92%6%38%35%17%14%78%7%Tier 1
Tobacco98%30%52%38%30%15%76%3%Tier 1
Wholesalers & Liquidators94%24%22%44%30%13%80%7%Tier 2
Wine & Spirits95%24%28%47%32%15%84%14%Tier 1

Across Retail & E-commerce, Textiles & Nonwovens's barrier rates are broadly in line with peers. WAF at 92%, JavaScript at 35%, and AI blocking at 7% all sit near the cohort median. Tier difficulty (mean 1.48) is below the group average.

11,100 landing pages